These documents are all PDFs. To download the free Adobe PDF Reader, click here.
Moeller et al. v. Taco Bell Corp.: Class action against Taco Bell Corp. alleging violations of the Title III of the ADA and state law for architectural barriers to persons who use wheelchairs or scooters in California restaurants.
- Class Action Complaint
- Class Certification Brief
- Class Certification Reply Brief
- Order Granting Class Certification
- Opposition to Taco Bell's Motion to Decertify the Damages Class
- Order Denying Taco Bell's Motion to Decertify the Damages Class
- Order Appointing Special Master to Survey Stores
- Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
- Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
- Order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment
Lucas v. Kmart Corp.: Class action under Title III of the ADA against a department store chain for inaccessible merchandise aisles, check-out aisles, parking and other features.
- Class Action Complaint
- Class Certification Brief
- Class Certification Reply Brief
- Motion to Lift Bankruptcy Stay
- Supplemental Class Certification Brief
- Supplemental Brief concerning bankruptcy and attorneys' fees.
- Order Granting Class Certification
- Order Certifying Damages Sub-Class for Settlement Purposes
- Order Approving Settlement
- Order Approving Request for Attorneys' Fees
- Settlement Agreement
Barber v. Colorado Department of Revenue: Lawsuit against the State of Colorado for failure to make reasonable accommodations in its driver's license laws to permit a sighted designee to supervise a 15-year-old's driving in lieu of her mother, who is blind.
- Amended Complaint
- Opposition to State's Motion to Dismiss
- Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss
- Motion to Reconsider Order Granting in Part Motion to Dismiss
- Reply in Support of Motion to Reconsider
- Order Granting Motion to Reconsider
- Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
- Motion to Reconsider [grant of summary judgment to defendant]
- Reply Brief in Support of Reconsideration
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Nationl Federation of the Blind v. E*Trade Access, Inc.
Colorado Cross Disability Coalition v. Colorado Rockies Baseball Club, Ltd.: Lawsuit against the owners and operators of a baseball park relating to accessible seating.
- Complaint
- Opposition to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
- Surreply in Opposition to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
- Order Denying Summary Judgment
- Plaintiffs' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Gooden v. Timpte, Inc.: Title VII action involving racial harassment.
- Complaint
- Motion for summary judgment
- Opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment
- Reply in support of Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment
- Order denying both motions for summary judgment (available on Westlaw at 2000 WL 34507333)
Housing for All v. Monroe Group, Inc.: Lawsuit under the Fair Housing Act challenging discrimination on the basis of familial status.
- Complaint
- Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment
- Plaintiffs' Reply and Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
Lincoln Property Company, N.C., Inc. v. Wagner Architectural Team, Ltd.: Fair Housing Act suit challenging inaccessible apartments under design and construct standards.
- Motion to intervene
- Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment
- Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
Shepherd v. United States Olympic Committee and Hollonbeck v. United States Olympic Committee: Action under Rehabilitation Act and ADA against the USOC based on discriminatory support and funding for Paralympic athletes.
- Shepherd Amended Complaint
- Hollonbeck Amended Complaint
- Shepherd Motion re: Receipt of Federal Funds
- Shepherd Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication
- Shepherd Opposition to Summary Judgment
- Shepherd Reply in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication
- Hollonbeck Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
- Draft Order by Plaintiffs
- Order Granting USOC's Motions
- Athletes’ Opening Brief to the Tenth Circuit
- Athletes’ Reply Brief
Taylor v. Regional Transportation District: Action against transit agency alleging violations of the ADA and Rehabilitation Act based on frequently broken lifts, passbys, improper wheelchair securement, failure to announce stops, retaliation and other allegedly discriminatory policies and practices.
Lane v. Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District: Action under the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act and California state law against the operator of a fixed-route bus system for discrimination against blind and visually impaired persons by failing to announce bus stops and routes.
Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition et al. v. Taco Bell Corp.: Class action against Taco Bell Corp. alleging violations of the ADA and state law for narrow queue lines and high service counters in Colorado restaurants.
- Class Action Complaint
- Class Certification Brief
- Order Granting Class Certification (available at 184 F.R.D. 354)
- Brief seeking summary judgment establishing that narrow queue lines in new construction violate the ADA
- Settlement Agreement
Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition v. Fey Concert Company: Action against the owners and operators of a large concert amphitheater alleging violation of the ADA and state law (including violation of the state consumer protection act) for failing to provide dispersed, wheelchair-accessible and companion seating.
Williams v. City and County of Denver: Action under the ADA and Rehabilitation Act against the owner and operator of a concert amphitheater for discriminatory policies and architectural barriers.
Richardson v. City of Steamboat Springs: Action under Title II and the Rehabilitation Act against municipality for inaccessible bus system and other inaccessible city programs and services.
Ehman v. Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Denver: Action under Title III of the ADA against the Parade of Homes, an exhibition of custom houses that is open to the public for an admission fee.
Williams v. Hermanson Family Limited Partners: Title III claim against downtown store to install ramp.
- Opposition to Motion to Dismiss re: Exhaustion
- Order Denying Motion to Dismiss
- Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment re: Standing
- Order Denying Motion for Summary Judgment
- Opening Brief to the Tenth Circuit re: Burden of Proof Under Title III
- Reply Brief to the Tenth Circuit
- Tenth Circuit opinion affirming district court (available at 264 F.3d 999)
Farrar-Kuhn v. Conoco, Inc.: Action under the ADA against an owner and operator of a chain of gas stations and convenience stores for various accessibility violations.
Williams v. University of Denver: Action by law school graduate under the ADA and Rehabilitation Act against law school for various discriminatory practices and architectural barriers.
Pleadings
